https://ncutcdjournal.org/index.php/jtcdr/issue/feedJournal of Traffic Control Device Research2024-10-25T20:31:35+00:00Bryan J. Katz, Ph.D., P.E., PTOE, RSP2Ibryan.katz@toxcel.comOpen Journal Systems<p>The<strong> Journal of Traffic Control Device Research (JTCDR)</strong> is a publication of the National Committee on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (NCUTCD). The Journal will be maintained by the NCUTCD Research Committee. Authors are invited to submit technical papers and case studies for consideration for the journal.</p> <p>This journal is not meant to compete with other established research journals. Rather, the journal is intended to be written by practitioners and researchers for use by practitioners and researchers who are looking for evidence-based data to inform recommendations for changes in the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD). Therefore, while international papers will be considered, one of the main criteria will be the impact that the paper has on United States practice for providing direct input to MUTCD considerations.</p> <p> </p>https://ncutcdjournal.org/index.php/jtcdr/article/view/11Foreward2024-10-25T19:59:41+00:00Timothy Gatesgatestim@egr.msu.edu2024-10-25T00:00:00+00:00Copyright (c) 2024 Journal of Traffic Control Device Researchhttps://ncutcdjournal.org/index.php/jtcdr/article/view/12The Intricate Interstate2024-10-25T20:03:23+00:00Michael J. Tantillomtantillo@vhb.com2024-10-25T00:00:00+00:00Copyright (c) 2024 Journal of Traffic Control Device Researchhttps://ncutcdjournal.org/index.php/jtcdr/article/view/13The Steady Beacon2024-10-25T20:18:28+00:00Scott Kuznickiscottkuznicki@gmail.com2024-10-25T00:00:00+00:00Copyright (c) 2024 Journal of Traffic Control Device Researchhttps://ncutcdjournal.org/index.php/jtcdr/article/view/9Tucson BikeHAWK: Adapting the Pedestrian Hybrid Beacon to Assist Bicyclists in Crossing Arterial Streets2024-08-01T16:46:59+00:00Richard Nassirnassi1@gmail.comGabe Thumgthum@pagregion.com<p><strong><em>The operation of the Tucson BikeHAWK, crash history, usage, and compliance:</em></strong></p> <ul> <li><em> There have been <strong>NO</strong> cyclists related crashes over the last 6 years</em> (<em>even during the pandemic times) and 96% of the riders use the BikeHAWK as intended.</em></li> <li><em> Basically, 100% of family riders with children or children alone use the BikeHAWK as intended.</em></li> <li><em> 94% of the crossers were bicyclists and 6% were pedestrians generally at Bike Boulevard crossings.</em></li> <li><em> The device was found to be easily understood by all users and bicyclists who followed the designated paths with ease. The high level of understanding was most likely because the BikeHAWK was designed based upon their natural behavior that was observed while crossing at HAWK controlled crosswalks.</em></li> <li><em> There continues to be the normal high level of driver compliance to the HAWK crossing device, especially at the higher-speed crossings. Driver yielding compliance still consistently remains within the range from 97% to 100% yielding at HAWKs and BikeHAWKs. A new technique has dramatically increased pedestrian compliance which increased from approximately 70% to over 90% with the “HOT” button operation with minimal loss in arterial LOS. “HOT” button operations have been recommended by FHWA at such pedestrian crossings that respond promptly to the pedestrian’s or cyclist’s call button for service. (Automated pedestrian activation was experimented with, however there were many missed or false calls. It was found, especially true during the hot Tucson summers, pedestrians do not wait at the curb, but in the nearest shade to wait for the HAWK beacon to activate when in coordination mode.) </em></li> <li><em> 50% of riders using the BikeHAWK were males, 46% were females, and 6% were children. (This level of female ridership is significantly higher than the historical Tucson average regional percentage of 26%. The higher percentage is considered an indication of perceived safety by cycling experts)</em></li> </ul>2024-10-25T00:00:00+00:00Copyright (c) 2024 Journal of Traffic Control Device Researchhttps://ncutcdjournal.org/index.php/jtcdr/article/view/14Field Evaluation of Methods for Enhancing Sign Conspicuity2024-10-25T20:24:59+00:00Erin Kissnererin.kissner@toxcel.comBryan Katzbryan.katz@toxcel.comSteve Jacksonsteve.jackson@toxcel.comPamela Passargepamela.passarge@toxcel.com<p>The 2009 Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) outlines various strategies to<br>enhance the conspicuity of traffic signs, defined as a traffic sign’s ability to stand out and attract<br>attention. Improving sign conspicuity is believed to directly and indirectly impact safety by<br>promoting compliance, reducing speeds, and decreasing accidents. However, despite these<br>enhancements, there is a lack of comprehensive research on their actual effectiveness on driver<br>behavior. This study aims to fill that gap by evaluating the effectiveness of these conspicuity<br>treatments, focusing on methods currently endorsed by the MUTCD rather than exploring novel<br>treatments.<br>To conduct this evaluation, the research team reviewed existing literature and practices,<br>consulting with members of the Traffic Control Devices Pooled Fund Study (TCD PFS) to<br>identify which MUTCD treatments were being effectively utilized across states. Given that<br>conspicuity, especially retroreflectivity, cannot be effectively replicated in laboratory settings, the<br>researchers employed field experiments to gather data. They utilized a two-part approach,<br>combining observational field data and eye-tracking studies, to assess how these conspicuity<br>treatments influence driver behavior. This methodology allowed for a nuanced understanding of<br>whether these enhancements lead to increased attention to signs and subsequent changes in<br>driving behavior.</p>2024-10-25T00:00:00+00:00Copyright (c) 2024 Journal of Traffic Control Device Researchhttps://ncutcdjournal.org/index.php/jtcdr/article/view/8Case Study on the Application of Temporary Orange Pavement Markings in Work Zones2024-08-01T16:55:37+00:00Tim Luttrellluttrelltb@comcast.netMelody Matoutnagham.matout@atssa.comEric Perryeric.perry@atssa.com<p>To further advance traffic safety and reduce work zone injuries and fatalities, ATSSA promotes innovation in work zone traffic control practices, materials, and equipment. Recently, the ATSSA Pavement Marking Committee brought together individuals from various public and private organizations with different backgrounds to identify needs and challenges, share new technology and information, and discover and advocate for proven safety countermeasures. One recent focus for the committee included the application of temporary orange pavement markings in work zones, an experimental technique per the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD). To assess orange pavement marking practices, ATSSA created a task force focused on this innovation. Seven DOTs have applied orange pavement markings in various configurations to improve work zone safety for the traveling public. From this information, ATSSA created a synthesis document on the application of different types of temporary orange pavement markings in the United States. </p>2024-10-25T00:00:00+00:00Copyright (c) 2024 Journal of Traffic Control Device Researchhttps://ncutcdjournal.org/index.php/jtcdr/article/view/15Observational Assessment of the Effectiveness of Traffic Control Devices on Lane Use Compliance on Motorways2024-10-25T20:29:48+00:00Scott Kuznickisk@moderntrafficconsultants.comAdam Greensteinadam.greenstein@wsp.com<p>Modern roadway design philosophy assumes that slower and non-continuing vehicles remain in the<br>outside lanes of motorways, which are median-divided, multi-lane, high-speed free-flow roads<br>characterized by controlled and limited access, e.g., freeways. Correspondingly, proper selection of a<br>travel lane by the vehicle operator is generally understood to enhance safety and operational performance.<br>Lane selection according to the basic rule assumes that the innermost (median-adjacent) lane of<br>the roadway in each direction functions as an auxiliary lane, being reserved for vehicles expediting<br>passing maneuvers and subsequently vacating the lane. Cultural perspectives indicate a conflict between<br>those who value the flexibility of passing lane availability and others who demand strict compliance with<br>the speed limit, constraining the availability of this auxiliary lane. Such inflexible adherence to speed<br>limits by vehicle automation systems and Intelligent Speed Assistance will further exacerbate the<br>prevalence of antisocial inappropriate lane use.</p> <p>This paper presents a model developed to identify the position (leftward, rightward) and status<br>(expediting, blocking, cruising) of vehicles using the inside lane, based on time-space relationships.<br>Application of this discrete model to a heuristic field investigation of basic rule conformance and<br>responsiveness indicated limited local and systemic effectiveness of regulatory signing in the United<br>States. Cruising and blocking behaviors were observed to be commonplace, suggesting imbalanced<br>enforcement with respect to speed and a need for additional auxiliary lanes along uphill grades and within<br>interchanges. Alongside adjustments to policy, enforcement, and education, tactical deployments of<br>active-feedback signing hold potential for improving conformance with the basic rule.</p>2024-10-25T00:00:00+00:00Copyright (c) 2024 Journal of Traffic Control Device Researchhttps://ncutcdjournal.org/index.php/jtcdr/article/view/10Cover and Full PDF: Click on this article to download the cover and a full PDF of the Journal issue2024-10-25T19:56:25+00:00Bryan Katzbryan.katz@toxcel.com2024-10-25T00:00:00+00:00Copyright (c) 2024 Journal of Traffic Control Device Research